Catalogue cleanup
(Difference between revisions)
Matthewg42 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| 16h33m20.2s / 26°26'55" || Antares spikes on original survey images? || 7 || Identified | || 16h33m20.2s / 26°26'55" || Antares spikes on original survey images? || 7 || Identified | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || 5h13m54.5s / -7°50'16.9" || Suspected artefacts near Rigel || ? | ||
| + | || Identified | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| please add! | || please add! | ||
Revision as of 12:59, 16 October 2007
Here is a list of regions where we suspect there is erroneous data in the star catalogues.
| Region Bounds (RA/Dec - J2000) | Possible causes | Appears in catalogue #'s | Status (see note 1) |
| 16h33m20.2s / 26°26'55" | Antares spikes on original survey images? | 7 | Identified |
| 5h13m54.5s / -7°50'16.9" | Suspected artefacts near Rigel | ? | Identified |
| please add! |
Notes
1: Status values
Please use these statuses:
- Identified - a rough description of the problem has been done - i.e. the RA/Dec added to the table above.
- In Progress - someone is currently trying to list all the stars which are affected.
- Detailed - all bad stars have been logged.
- Fixed - the catalogue files have been fixed in the development repo.
- Released - the fix should have been released and available for download.
