Catalogue cleanup

Here is a list of regions where we suspect there is erroneous data in the star catalogues.

Region Bounds (RA/Dec - J2000)	Possible causes	Appears in catalogue #'s	Status (see note 1)
16h33m20.2s / 26°26'55"	Antares spikes on original survey images?	7	Identified
5h13m54.5s / -7°50'16.9"	Suspected artifacts near Rigel	7	Identified
HP104297	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP104139	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP103976	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP103920	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP103825	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP103976	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
HP105515	Spikes scanned as red stars	?	Identified
21h32m17.8s / +48°28'10.3"	This mag9.85 star does not exist	?	Identified
5h38m44.4s / -2°40'19"	The mag8.2star does not exist	?
Virgo Constellation	Inconsistency : SkyAndTelescope.com 's chart: http://imagebin.org/100486 and Stellarium's: http://imagebin.org/100487 . +1 to S&T's from my observations.	?
RA/Dec 4h 14m 9.6s/-7deg39' 45.1s (close to HIP 19849).	A straight line of about 20 stars around mag 13 to 15 plus other "unnatural" lines of stars in same region seen when fov ~0.5 deg or less. The 5 additional catalogues have been downloaded.	6 and 7	Identified
HP1158 (RA 0 14 14 Dec -7 37 2)	panel of artifacts. Forming squarish patterns? FOV .3 deg	6 and 7	Identified

Notes

1: Status values

Please use these statuses:

• Identified - a rough description of the problem has been done - i.e. the RA/Dec added to the table above.
• In Progress - someone is currently trying to list all the stars which are affected.
• Detailed - all bad stars have been logged.
• Fixed - the catalogue files have been fixed in the development repo.
• Released - the fix should have been released and available for download.